1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2002 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2002 Lotus Elise is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotus Elise (134 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 759 kg more than 2002 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lotus Elise. (175 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lotus Elise.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2002 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Aerostar | Elise |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4850 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2310 mm |