1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 805 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Aerostar | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Aerostar | Minica |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2978 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2350 mm |
