1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2004 BMW 316

To start off, 2004 BMW 316 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 316. (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Ford Aerostar 2004 BMW 316
Make Ford BMW
Model Aerostar 316
Year Released 1994 2004
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2978 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1375 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2730 mm