1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 77 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Aerostar | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Aerostar | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2978 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1438 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2720 mm |
