1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 202 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Aerostar | CSX |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |