1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Toyota RunX.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Aerostar | RunX |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |