1994 Ford Aerostar vs. 2012 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Swift is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Aerostar | 2012 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Aerostar | Swift |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |