1994 Ford Aspire vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aspire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aspire would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Nissan Livina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 147 kg more than 1994 Ford Aspire.
Because 2008 Nissan Livina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Aspire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aspire. (100 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aspire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Aspire | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Aspire | Livina |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1077 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 52 L |
