1994 Ford Contour vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1994 Ford Contour is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Contour (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Contour (180 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Contour | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Contour | 66 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.9 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |