1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1994 Ford Fairlane is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (205 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Fairlane (357 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Fairlane | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Fairlane | Cortina |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3983 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 58.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2500 mm |
