1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 1994 Ford Fairlane is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (222 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Fairlane | 1967 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | 4 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2410 mm |
