1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 405 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Fairlane (348 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | 626 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3983 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 348 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2620 mm |