1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (205 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 1124 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Fairlane (357 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Fairlane | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3983 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2420 mm |
