1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (222 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 50 kg more than 1994 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Fairlane (388 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Ranger |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 3010 mm |