1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1994 Ford Fairlane. (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 159 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Fairlane. (348 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fairlane | S60 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3983 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 348 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2720 mm |