1994 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (205 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 1140 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Fairlane | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 3983 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2320 mm |
