1994 Ford Falcon vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1994 Ford Falcon. (205 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Falcon weights approximately 435 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Falcon | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2350 mm |