1994 Ford Fiesta vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1994 Ford Fiesta is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1994 Ford Fiesta. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Fiesta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 45 kg more than 1994 Ford Fiesta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Fiesta. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Fiesta.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Fiesta | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fiesta | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1118 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2420 mm |