1994 Ford Mustang vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 815 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Mustang | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 600 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |