1994 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 890 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Mustang | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |
