1994 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (317 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (415 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Mustang | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Mustang | Fronte |
Year Released | 1994 | 1976 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 415 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 30 L |