1994 Ford Mustang vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste

To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (317 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (415 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (172 Nm @ 4 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Ford Mustang 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Mustang Celeste
Year Released 1994 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4601 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 317 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 415 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 90 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4120 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 45 L