1994 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (317 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 570 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (415 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Mustang | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 360 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 415 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 58 L |
