1994 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2000 Vector RD 180 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1994 Ford Mustang. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Mustang | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | Ford | Vector |
Model | Mustang | RD 180 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.9 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |