1994 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (317 HP) has 247 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 926 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Mustang (415 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Ford Mustang 2005 MCC Crossblade
Make Ford MCC
Model Mustang Crossblade
Year Released 1994 2005
Engine Size 4601 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 70 HP
Torque 415 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1670 kg 744 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 1810 mm