1994 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1994 Ford Mustang. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Mustang.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Mustang | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | F-250 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.9 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 103 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3970 mm |