1994 Ford Probe vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 1994 Ford Probe is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Probe weights approximately 1 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Probe | 1956 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Probe | RM A |
Year Released | 1994 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1550 mm |