1994 Ford Royale vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Royale | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Royale | 200 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |