1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 350 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Tempo | Taunus |
Year Released | 1994 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |