1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 370 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 1964 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Tempo | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |
