1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1969 Rover 2000
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rover 2000 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Rover 2000 (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1969 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 1969 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tempo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |