1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 425 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Tempo | 102 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2160 mm |
