1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1992 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 425 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Because 1992 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 1992 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Tempo | Cougar |
Year Released | 1994 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |