1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1993 Mazda AZ-1
To start off, 1994 Ford Tempo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 361 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | AZ-1 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 834 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2240 mm |
