1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 305 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Tempo | CR-V |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |