1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (149 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 626 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |