1994 Ford Tempo vs. 1997 Nissan Gloria
To start off, 1997 Nissan Gloria is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Gloria is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan Gloria weights approximately 335 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Because 1997 Nissan Gloria is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Nissan Gloria. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 1997 Nissan Gloria | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | Gloria |
Year Released | 1994 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |