1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 565 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |