1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 160 kg more than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 2002 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Tempo | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1035 kg |
