1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (110 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 131 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford C-MAX (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Tempo | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2650 mm |