1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 90 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Tempo | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |
