1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 275 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tempo | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2730 mm |
