1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1671 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3200 mm |
