1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 2006 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2966 cc |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3200 mm |
