1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1994 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1994 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2880 mm |