1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Tempo | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1994 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |