1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (134 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1994 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (203 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications:

1994 Ford Tempo 2009 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Tempo 3
Year Released 1994 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2986 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 134 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1195 kg 1465 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2650 mm