1994 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Ford Tempo | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Tempo | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2685 mm |
