1994 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 244 kg more than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Thunderbird | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1864 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |