1994 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1994 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Ford Thunderbird | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Thunderbird | KB |
Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3494 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 93.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |